Showing posts with label phishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label phishing. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Phishing attack -- purporting to come from Absa bank

Click this pic for a clear view of the text:


If you see one of these in your inbox, go to the institution in question and send them a copy of the email. (Go directly to the site in question without clicking any links on the email itself. The email will take you to a duplicate site that LOOKS like the institution in question. It's all fake.)

Then, if you're using Gmail, report it as a phishing attack, and it'll be deleted. If you don't use Gmail, delete the mail.


Do NOT click on the link. If you're curious, when you receive a phishing attack, you can hover your mouse over the link, and look at the address bar at the bottom of your browser. In this case, the address comes up as something at 'karatesamurai.com'. Does that sound like a legitimate Absa address to you?

I've screengrabbed this with 'Show Details' on. Notice the 'Mailed-By' field. It's 'ifk.wopsa8.com'. You can easily see that that's nothing to do with Absa if you delve into the innards of the message.

But the rule is this: your banking institution will never send you a request of this kind. Ignore them.

The telling part here for me is that I'm not even an Absa client.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

419 Phishing -- the scams that hurt the internet -- how they work

Arthur (Goldstuck, I presume?) commented on my post, 'Gone Phishing', pointing out that technically, what I received is the standard '419' scam, and that phishing is a lot more sophisticated.

It's worth looking at this in a little detail.

The '419' works like this... I receive an email, seemingly targeted at me, mentioning some vast amount of money that has been erroneously left in someone's bank account. For some reason, normally to do with the tragic death of the bank account holder, that money has to be disposed of by a certain date, or else it gets redistributed to someone in power.

The person sending the email is empowered through some technicality to involve me in the transaction, and for simply receiving and forwarding the money, I'll get a percentage of the money.

Phishing is different. I get an email from a banking (or other) institution, informing me most sincerely and convincingly that there's been some sort of security breach on my online account (whether or not I hold one), and that I must go to the institution's site and redo all of my security settings.

When I follow the link to the site, I'm asked for all sorts of interesting and useful information. Such as my ID number. My bank account number. My 'old' password. The size of my underpants.

And like the dutiful idiot I am, I supply all of these details, convinced that my bank would never bend me over a barrel and slather my nether regions in KY Jelly, ready to take one for the team.

Fourteen seconds later, my cellphone beeps, telling me that everything I've earned in my entire life has now been transfered to an account in the Bahamas. Clever me.

Now how do I equate the two scams?

Firstly, out of sheer laziness. But secondly, cos they're both con-based. Both scams rely on the naivete of the user for the hook to sink.

The 419 uses pure greed as its lure. And the phishing scam uses fear.

With the 419, my brain sees sums like £30 000 000, and 10%. And my brain short circuits. And I think, 'Hell! Ten perCENT? They outta their cotton picking minds??? I'm gonna take the WHOLE LOT!!!' And so, I'm already plumped to be reeled in as they make their strange and quaintly illiterate requests for information and cash and bank account details and ID numbers.


Phishing uses the fear that someone might be in the position to scam me. 'Someone' has breached the bank's security. And this 'someone' has the power to strip my account of all my earnings and my entire overdraft. And if I act FAST, I'll be able to thwart the scammer! And so I play right into their hands and hand it all to them on a plate.

Both are very clever. And both operate on a subtle level.

The crazy broken English of the 419 scam is deliberate, I would say. They make themselves SOUND as though they're thicker than two scoops of soft-serve in Iceland. And that's all in the service of activating our greed. They WANT us to think, 'Oh, jeez! This chump can't even speak English! I'm a phenominally gifted person in the brains department! Surely one such as I can outwit this scumbag? How stupid can he think I am???'

If that happens, we don't stand a chance.

We must resist. We must say, 'If I were to run a scam like this, how would I want my 'opponent' to feel about me?' The correct answer is: 'I'd want my opponent to think that my brains are runnier than a Mumbai sewer.'

The subtlety of phishing scams is that they make me feel that they're deeply concerned about the safety of my money. I respond to their concern by thinking, 'Well, they MENTION things like fraud and theft and stuff like that, so that means they're obviously NOT fraudsters themselves. I mean, what kinda fraudster would actually MENTION their fraud in the fraud setup? No way. This MUST be legit.' And then we're dead. Bye bye money.

So. Let's resist this crud. If you get a phishing or scamming attack, here's what Arthur suggests you do...

When I get these, I take great delight in c&p'ing the e-mails header record, and then forwarding the e-mail with the header to the relevant ISP and/or e-mail service. When that's the likes of Yahoo or Hotmail, I usually end up by getting an e-mail saying that the user's address has been canned. And at the very least, they'd have to find another e-mail address. It takes me all of 30 seconds. I also do it for the "lottery winner" scams.

I'd like to think that the reason I get far fewer of these than I used to, is because of these services of mine to the online fraternity. But it's probably because of better ISP filters.
If you're a Gmail user like me, you MIGHT know that they've got a 'Report Phishing' button in the 'Reply' dropdown menu. Click it, and it asks you to confirm that you're reporting a phishing attack. (I kinda wish Gmail would wake up to the Web2.0 potential of this tool. If they 'rewarded' their users by revealing how accurate their phishing reporting activities were, so many more people would be aware of the crime. I'd LOVE to know how accurate my efforts have been.)

Another thing to do, especially with standard Banking phishing attacks, is, in Arthur's words, to 'forward the e-mail and header to the "real" supplier'.

The thing NOT to do is reply or respond in ANY way. Your email header contains a heck of a lot more information than you'd like these crazed lunatics to know. They can deduce all sorts of stuff about you if you respond. So don't do it.

Now. I'm off to Columbia, where someone's widow is offering me free sex and eighteen billion Deutsche marks. What's that in Zim dollars?

Monday, June 25, 2007

Gone Phishing -- Anita Fripong promises me my share of a measly 4.5 million US dollars. Cheapskate.

A note from Roy: This is a phishing attack. Do NOT reply to Ms Anita Fripong. If you do, you'll be giving her a lead as to who you are, what your legitimate email address is, and some kind of a clue as to how to fleece you out of some substantial amount of dollars. I'm reproducing it here cos it's basically just plain hilarious that some people actually get duped by this rubbish.
Compliments

from: Ms Anita Fripong anitafripong79@hotmail.co.uk
reply-to: anitafripong@latinmail.com
date: 25-Jun-2007 14:42
subject: Compliments
mailed-by: hotmail.co.uk

From: Ms Anita Fripong
Accra, Ghana.

Dearest,

I got your contact during my search for a reliable, honest and a trust worth person to entrust this huge transfer project with. My name is Ms Anita Fripong, Branch manager of a financial institution here in Ghana. I am a singal mother with a kid. I am writing to solicit your assistance in the transfer of $ 4,550.000.00 Million United States dollars only.

This fund is the excess of what my branch in which am the manager made as profit during the 2005 financial year. I have already submitted annual report for that year to my head office here in Accra as I have watched with keen interest as they will never know of this excess.I have since, placed this amount of $ 4,550.000.00 Million United States dollars only to an Escrow Coded account without a beneficiary (anonymous) to avoid trace.

As an officer of the bank, I cannot be directly connected to this money thus I am impelled to request for your assistance to receive this money into your bank account on my behalf. I intend to part 30% of this fund to you while 70% shall be for me. I do need to stress that there are practically no risk involved in this. It's going to be a bank-to-bank transfer. All I need from you is to stand as the original depositor of this fund so that the fund can be transferred to your account. If you accept this offer, I will appreciate your timely response urgently.

With Regards,

Ms Anita Fripong

ShareThis